How to Select Your Trader Voice Solution 2026

This is a condensed version of our paper. Access the full report using the download facility below.

Trader Voice Strategy

Approaching a Trader Voice refresh as a routine technology upgrade is risky. A like-for-like replacement can leave firms overpaying, under-serving users, accepting avoidable vendor risk and locking themselves into infrastructure that may provide excess capacity but is not ready for the next decade.

Trader Voice remains a primary trading channel for many users, even within a broader communications environment dominated by chat. A successful strategy must consider the needs of Traders, Compliance, Operations, Security, Networks, Procurement, clients and counterparties. It may also need to reflect ESG objectives, all in line with wider technology strategy.

Use Cases

The physical turret still sits on the trading desk, but voice usage is now dictated by asset class, workflow, liquidity model and user profile. Equities are largely electronic and Fixed Income is moving in the same direction, while high-touch Macro, Market-Making, Prime Brokerage and Sales teams each need different physical and digital interfaces. The old one-size-fits-all model is no longer fit for purpose.

Trading floors are quieter and many conversations now take place on chat applications, but voice still supports liquidity formation, relationship management and complex execution. Private wires, direct dials, speaker channels, open hoots and intercom remain valuable for specific groups. Firms therefore need a granular understanding of who uses voice, why they use it, how they use it and what each user group genuinely requires.

Trader Voice is still central to mission-critical strategy planning. In a cloud-led market, the next platform selection may be a long-term strategic decision, so vendor choice matters.

Strategic Context

  1. Cloud Does Not Automatically Reduce Risk

The main Trader Voice vendors are moving to the Cloud and many on-premise solutions are approaching end-of-life. However, cloud does not automatically reduce risk. Some offerings are closer to hosted services in third-party data centers than true cloud-native platforms. Upgrades may remain complex, security responses may still be slow and buyers can continue to carry operational and financial risk.

Security should be involved from the start to test whether the vendor is technically, operationally and contractually capable of supporting critical infrastructure. Deployment still requires careful planning, design and testing. Genuine cloud services can provide rapid provisioning, particularly after mergers or during business continuity events, but this depends on security, identity management and data management being ready.

As much of the market moves to the cloud, on-premise solutions may still have a role in regions where data sovereignty, privacy and distrust of cloud remain important considerations.

  1. Security and AI

A modern Trader Voice RFP should prioritize security and governance as highly as functionality. Security and resilience are more regulated than before, with frameworks such as the EU Digital Operational Resilience Act [DORA] increasing scrutiny of technology service providers. Accreditation can help, but firms should look beyond certificates and interrogate whether their specific requirements are met.

AI also needs explicit treatment. It is no longer just a compliance transcription tool; it is reshaping front-office workflows, supervision and operational oversight. Firms must understand how proprietary voice data is protected, especially from leakage into wider AI or LLM training environments.

  1. Mobile and Remote Working

Technology and user experience play a role in talent retention. Travelling staff may need to join hoots and conferences from mobile devices or access a multichannel experience from other offices. Some users need to remain connected to important deals without sitting in front of a desktop turret for long periods out of hours. Mobile capabilities should therefore be part of discovery and selection.

  1. Unified Communications

Microsoft Teams has normalized corporate video and collaboration, but it is not a turret replacement. Rather than trying to develop UC functionality, TVS vendors are more likely to provide the required UX through integration and alignment with Teams, either directly or via middleware. Some compliance vendors also use Teams integration to manage the usage, capture and storage of third-party messaging apps.

Trading Communications Tech

New trading communications systems should deliver long-term value through user experience, productivity, scalability and risk management. Trader Voice should be considered as part of a wider compliant communications ecosystem that supports the full workflow around trading conversations.

Turrets, Soft Clients and Platform Choice

The trading turret remains the primary desktop device for high-capacity users, helping traders visualize, prioritize and manage multiple calls quickly. However, few users require full capacity. Modular units, soft clients and high-spec VoIP phones can all play a role, depending on user needs, risk appetite and workflow.

Soft clients offer flexibility, secure remote access, potentially lower ownership costs and free up desk space. They are useful for lighter users and continuity scenarios, but heavy trading-floor users may still need multiple channels, familiar peripherals and high-capacity workflows. Buyers should test technical dependencies, resilience, user experience and any capability gaps before assuming that soft clients can replace turrets across the estate.

Business Continuity

Soft clients are now included in most Trader Voice proposals, but purchasers need to understand their limits in regular and contingency operations. Disaster recovery facilities should allow users to restart work effectively when an office becomes unavailable. Pure application-as-a-service models may struggle if large numbers of heavy turret users require full DR positions.

Remote working during lockdowns showed that traders can operate away from the floor, but it also highlighted limits around connectivity, compliance and user acceptance. Working from home is not a primary DR option for most trading teams. DR facilities still have a role, although they may contain fewer hard turrets than before.

Delivering Technology Strategy

Delivering a Trader Voice strategy requires input from all relevant stakeholders and a clear view of how the business wants to operate. The goal is not simply to replace voice technology, but to support the whole trading workstream from initial contact through to execution, while improving productivity, flexibility, compliance and security.

unbranded turret in blue gradient

Integration

A comprehensive trading communications strategy should integrate Trader Voice with Teams, CRM, OMS, compliance systems and other core tools, using APIs, CTI and specialist middleware where needed. Target benefits include click-to-dial, auto-populated fields, easier modality switching and centralized compliance. Existing vendor integrations and partnerships should be tested to ensure promised benefits can be realized.

ESG

ESG is increasingly important, particularly in regions affected by sustainability reporting and due diligence requirements. Computing should use efficient data centers and, where possible, clean energy, with consumption linked to real usage. Vendors should also demonstrate ethical people policies and strong governance. As with security and resilience, accreditation helps, but relevant evidence should be sought on the key parameters.

Rightsizing the Solution

A Trader Voice upgrade, as part of a wider trading communications strategy, is still likely to require some turrets. The key is not to overestimate quantity or specification. Many banks have turrets with unused buttons and live circuits that are barely used. Usage data should be analyzed before selection to understand call volumes, preferred channels, speaker use, handset requirements and genuine demand.

Tools like our TIMM™ service can enrich this analysis using data from the TVS, call logger, circuit database and approved user records. At the most basic level, firms should also ask users what they need. Some traders no longer want turrets at all, creating opportunities for savings without reducing effectiveness.

Selection

A rigorous RFP process remains essential, even with a limited number of global suppliers. Generic RFPs allow vendors to gloss over gaps with polished responses. Hidden costs can emerge through upgrade fees, slow security responses, confusing licensing, wasted turret capacity and tools that do not match the needs of specific desks.

Shortlisted providers now offer multiple devices, services and architectures, each with different trade-offs. Moving to the cloud, for example, may affect latency depending on data center location. Only a well-informed process will uncover issues of this kind.

Front Office, Security, Procurement, Operations and specialist advisers should be aligned before vendor responses arrive. The contract should avoid unnecessary lock-in, ensure the firm pays only for what it needs and allocate future risk clearly, including upgrades, integrations and security obligations.

Buyers should push for a genuine application-as-a-service model where evergreen capability, security updates and new integrations are included in the subscription rather than treated as recurring extras.

Compliance and Legal

Regulatory compliance is a core selection criterion. The global trajectory remains towards greater capture, storage, surveillance, reconciliation, retrieval and trade reconstruction across electronic communications that lead to a trade. Any communications platform must integrate reliably into the compliance ecosystem.

During selection, firms should confirm that records are accessible, data can be captured reliably and integrations are in place. As AI surveillance develops, audio feeds may need to be handed off in near-real time to demonstrate best efforts.

Compliance, Legal, and Security departments play a greater role in selection processes and they have concerns about Trader Voice. Below are three, non-vendor specific issues that require governance:

  • Intercom, hoots, and speaker channels are audible to people who aren’t on the official access lists.
  • It can be difficult to record open speaker channels in order to identify individuals involved and discern the details of conversations.
  • Barge-in functionality is a Trader Voice standard that can give people unintended access to restricted information and has previously been implicated in “front-running” scandals.

A Compliance Officer’s ideal solution would initiate calls only with existing counterparties and capture interaction details across all channels. Improved interoperability is bringing this concept closer.

Integrated capture and surveillance tools vary by vendor, and dedicated specialist services may still be required. Many banks are moving towards multichannel data aggregation, pulling structured and unstructured communications data into central repositories that support compliance, supervision and future analytics.

Transformation and TCO

Total cost of ownership remains important. Cloud implementation work is often underestimated, and detailed cost analysis can reveal operational dependencies, integration needs and hidden risks. Firms should clarify implementation effort, operating costs, service levels, compliance responsibilities and support arrangements before committing.

Additional engineering, testing and migration support may be needed, even where large on-premise infrastructure has disappeared. Some solutions still require supplementary peripherals or carry significant support obligations. Predictability matters: the commercial model should protect against unexpected costs and ensure the platform remains secure, compliant and fit for purpose.

The Near Future

Voice communication remains integral to trading, but the market is entering a significant transition. Traders use more communications platforms than ever before, while regulation, AI-driven surveillance, mobility and demand for flexibility are reshaping the environment.

The path of least resistance is no longer enough. Firms need informed, strategic decisions that make the whole trading communications environment fit for purpose, compliant, secure and ready to adapt. Trader Voice remains critical, but its value will increasingly depend on how well it integrates with the wider communications, compliance and technology ecosystem.

Downloads